“Balancing” or Censorship?

It has not taken long for PM David Cameron’s likening of Gaza to a prison camp to draw ire:

Foreign Office sources suggested Downing Street had been remiss in omitting from Cameron’s speech the sort of “balancing” comments that are routinely made about Israel’s security – especially the fate of a captured soldier being held by Hamas – when its policies on the Palestinians are criticised. [Source]

While presenting my paper at last week’s conference I touched upon the subject of art and censorship vis-a-vis Palestine.

When, in 2006, the Israeli student Lior Halperin established an exhibition of child art from Palestinian refugee camps at Brandeis University, the exhibit was removed after a mere four days.

The reasoning behind the removal was cited as ‘balance’ – the university could not exhibit a Palestinian show without an accompanying Israeli exhibition.

That there was no Israeli exhibition resulted in the display being removed and the issue wiped from the agenda.

As I related the account various members of the audience nodded slowly or chuckled in anticipation –  for they understood the  subtext.

Likewise, the condemnation for what Cameron ostensibly addressed as the truth is merely post-quip censorship.

That Cameron did not mention the captive soldier, Gilad Shalit, in his speech does not lessen the gravity of Shalit’s circumstances as Ron Prosor, Israel’s ambassador to Britain, denotes:

The people of Gaza are the prisoners of the terrorist organisation Hamas. The situation in Gaza is the direct result of Hamas’s rule and priorities.

We know that the prime minister would also share our grave concerns about our own prisoner in the Gaza Strip, Gilad Shalit, who has been held hostage there for over four years, without receiving a single Red Cross visit. [Source]

Rather, it is rare occasion when the plight of Gaza is mentioned by a British leader – that it should be ‘balanced’ is irrelevent.

It is a situation that must not be detracted from and strong terminology must be used in cases such as this.

Gaza cannot be neutralized nor ignored – indeed, ‘prison camp’ is even an understatement in describing the conditions.

‘Hell’ would be a greater approximation, and yes, both Hamas and Israel are to blame at varying degrees.

Cameron On Gaza

As much as it pains me to break with tradition and agree with a Tory, David Cameron is (ahem) right on the mark:

The situation in Gaza has to change. Humanitarian goods and people must flow in both directions. Gaza cannot and must not be allowed to remain a prison camp.

The Israeli attack on the Gaza flotilla was completely unacceptable and I have told PM Netanyahu we will expect the Israeli inquiry to be swift, transparent and rigorous. [Source]

Let’s hope he has more cojones than his predecessors in moving beyond statement and into action.

Israel’s (Potential) Anti-Rights Legislation

Although this deserves so much more than a brief snippet and a link, my flight from Barcelona beckons and I must type against the clock.

In essence, therefore:

Four bills and amendments are pending that would seriously restrict the rights of Israelis to criticize the policies and actions of their government, Human Rights Watch said.

One would shut down groups that communicate information that could be used in charges filed in other countries against members of the Israeli government or army for violations of international law. A second would penalize organizations and individuals who express support for, or participate in, boycotts against Israel. A third would impose onerous and immediate reporting requirements on any group that accepts any amount of funding from a foreign government for any purpose, and the fourth would punish anyone who assists refugees after they illegally cross into Israel.

Of course, this raises the whole spectre of Israel’s relationship with democracy: it is more on and off than a celebrity dalliance.

Before pouring forth condemnation, it must first be approved – or disapproved – and we can only hope some degree of sense will prevail and make the choice the latter.

Find out more at Human Rights Watch, here.

Wife-tracker, Saudi-style

As Saudiwoman notes, you can run, but you can never hide when it comes to gender-based tracking in (and out of) Saudi Arabia:

I am currently on a family vacation in Italy but I had to post what the Ministry of Foreign Affairs sent my husband. Apparently they have a new service where they send the male guardian a text every time a “dependent” leaves the country. They don’t state which country the dependent left for but simply state that they did leave.

My husband tells me he got the same text when I left for Germany. I am an adult woman that has been earning my own income for over a decade now but according to the Saudi government, I am a dependent till the day I die because of my gender. [Source]

It is interesting that the tracking text does not detail the destination country – it would be too optimistic to imagine that it is concealed in the name of privacy.

No doubt coming soon: the Google App Wife Tracker: a dastardly fusion of Google Street Maps meets patriarchal yearnings to seek, control and curtail the freedom of every woman over the age of 18.

Pomegranates and Myrrh

Running parallel to the conference through the week has been an Arabic film festival, comprising works from Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq and North Africa.

Admittedly most frequently drawn into its dark depths by the promise of the most powerful air-conditioning on campus, some of the movies have been compelling (Maid for Sale), tedious (Basra) or oddly fascinating (Help).

By far the best however, is Pomegranates and Myrrh (Al Mor wa al Rumman), a 2009 Ramallah-based film by Najwa Najjar.

While the official blurb provides an idea of the film’s premise, it utterly fails to do it justice:

Ramallah, this decade. A free spirited woman dancer, Kamar, finds herself the wife of a prisoner, Zaid, and away from everything she loves until she returns to the dance, defying society’s taboos. At the dance, Kamar is confronted with Kais, a Palestinian returnee, who has taken Kamar’s role as the head choreographer. Sparks fly between Kamar and Kais, creating a more than passionate, emotional dance for both of them. Matters become even more complicated when Zaid’s sentence is extended.

To read the above would be to believe that it is a love story between two people (Kamar and Kais), with dance providing the backdrop.

This could not be further from the point, for central to Najjar’s piece is the land – indeed, a love-affair with the land, rather than Kais.

For Zaid, the land is worth more than his family, his wife or even his freedom: when Kamar tearfully pleads with him to sign the document that would allow the confiscation of the olive groves to proceed, but guarantee his freedom, he responds: ‘If the land is gone, then all is lost.’

Kamar’s relationship to the land is intrinsically linked to her own emotions: after the final argument with Zaid in jail, she ploughs the land visciously by hand.

Likewise, she dances her frustrations out on the bare soil of the night orchard, kicking up the dust and stones in feverish whirls.

The men, rather, assume a nominal role in the story.

During the Q&A session Najwa stressed the role of women not only in the movie, but in the making of it, with a number of significant positions being enacted by women.

Moreover, it is the mothers who support and guide Kamar, her sister who prompts her to return to dance and the formidable Umm Habib who provides a ballsy scene of rebuke to the IDF soldiers that raises a thousand goosebumps.

Surprisingly, in addition to these wonderfully profound themes Najjar brings the intifada to our midst in the most powerful manner.

The confiscation scene, the threat of the settlers, the futility of their Israeli lawyer and the endless injustice that is administrative detention is heart-breaking.

Pomegranates and Myrrh is quite possibly the best Palestinian movie in years – which makes it all the more irksome that the only copy on Amazon is a Swedish version.

But, should the lucky opportunity arise, do not miss what will be a truly moving and astounding piece of Middle Eastern contemporary cinema.

Grand Ayatollah Fadlallah (1935-2010)

Lebanon’s Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah was synonymous with many facets of Shiite political society, including Lebanon’s Hezbollah and Iraq’s Dawa Party.

If he must be lauded for one aspect of his long clerical career, let it be his issuance of fatwas that did not lack rationality.

"When one fires a bullet at you, you cannot offer him roses"

While Al Azhar churns out edicts addressing (non)pertinent subjects such as Mickey Mouse and breast-feeding co-workers, Fadlallah called for women to have the right to strike their husbands when attacked.

Such an agenda is sorely lacking in contemporary clerical circles, and even more so for his demise at the age of 75.

(An aside: odd how the press proffers attention to the more whimsical fatwas, while those of real use passed uncovered.)

There may not be a cleric as influential for a long time to come, but let us at least hope that his realistic approach to edict-construction will endure as a lasting legacy.

Something Beautiful

Via Roba, perfect for this balmy, heavy scented summer evening:

It is fabulous.

And as an extra find, Shim el Yasmine:

Perhaps not as visually lovely, but Hamed Sinno’s vocals are to die for.

Blogging for Democracy: Abdelkader Benkhaled

Politicians and blogs – the very juxtaposition is enough to prompt cold night sweats and grimaces.

But in Algeria the two are united on a promising note as the political activist and member of the Peace Society Movement (Harakat Mudjtamaa Silm), Abdelkader Benkhaled, uses the medium to promote freedom and equality:

Blogging is a new method to spread human values that all citizens of the world seeks to acquire. I focus mainly on political issues that young people leave today. I also write about my party’s positions, sometimes critical and sometimes in defense and sometimes by seeking feedback from my friends on facebook or site visitors.

Nevertheless, I turn to other subjects too, such as public freedoms, democracy in Algeria. It is inconceivable to force people to adopt a particular religion or punish them for their political beliefs, trying to overcome prejudice to build a democracy or freedoms are respected. [Source]

Interestingly, Benkhaled indicates the Egyptian blogging experience as a source of cyber-inspiration:

In the Arab world, the Egyptian experience is a pioneer and deserves to be studied. The Egyptians were able to create political parties on the net that are sometimes stronger and more influential than the actual parties.

Moroccan bloggers were also able to create an association of influential bloggers, ditto for the Lebanese. Still, the blogging in the Arab world needs more guidance and support.

The above however, remains a perplexing snippet: though true to a degree – insofar as the blogosphere is an influential force in these countries – at the same time it bows under the weight of censorship.

In the case of Morocco, the authorities go to great lengths to intimidate journalists and bloggers publishing for change, as noted in a recent post.

And the case of Egyptian businessman and blogger Khaled Sa’id (right) is all too fresh in our minds.

Beaten to death outside an internet café by plain-clothes officers in Alexandria on June 6, police were trying to suppress a digital video that showed officers dividing up narcotics and cash that had been seized in a drug bust.

Said had hoped to post the video, which he had obtained from friends, on his blog in order to expose police corruption, family members said.

Thus, while blogging for change is inspiring, it is nevertheless fraught with opposition and danger.

Blogging needs not just guidance and support (guidance?), it needs freedom first.

Which Benkhaled will hopefully succeed in enacting tentative steps towards.

O, Canada

You disappoint me so.

For years I have been under the impression that you were of the gentle, rational persuasion.

Which is why the following quips come as such an unwelcome surprise:

Canada recognizes Israel’s legitimate security concerns and its right to protect its citizens from terrorist attacks, including through the restriction of access to its territory, and its right to inspect ships in order to ensure that weapons and other military equipment do not reach the Gaza Strip.

[However] while we fully support the importance of delivering humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza, we also fully support Israel’s right to inspect ships to ensure military material and armaments do not reach the hands of Hamas terrorists. [Source]

There is a degree of veracity in the above: security must be maintained.

Nevertheless, it is almost as though the deaths of the civilians onboard never occurred – there is mention of inspection, but where is the line drawn between the purveyance of a craft and the murder of its inhabitants?

The political dogmatism sits in strong contrast to that of European Ministers, for whom the blockade is “unacceptable and counter-productive,” while the past week the US has bandied about the word ‘untenable’ in conjunction with the blockade.

Of course, Canada knows that inspection is one thing and overt violence resulting in death is another.

Which makes their unstinting support of the blockade all the more distasteful.

Zein Al-Jundi

I really should be more imaginative with my post titles, but in this instance the above name should be suffice.

Although, the reality that online clips of Zein could be found for neither love nor money indicates that if she is not currently widely known, she should be.

For now, I swiftly guide you here.

First heard on Kalejdoskop, her voice stood out from the range of global offerings, at first impressing that this simply must be a diva that has escaped my notice.

Not so.

Born in Damascus, Zein Al-Jundi became a household name in her native Syria before relocating to Austin, Texas to pursue a degree in architecture.

In 2004 she returned to music with her debut album, Traditional Songs from Syria, to be followed by her most recent offering, Sharrafouni.

Having worked with Hossam Ramzy, Tareq Abou Jawdeh, Elia Nasser, Andre Hajj, Tony Ja’ja’, Rony Barrak, Ali Mazbouh, and Tony Haddad (to name but a few), it is a remarkable project characterized by a tremendously seductive voice.

To find out more about Zein, click here.