Bella’s Kiss of Death to Kick-Assery

Earlier this week I experienced what could be termed an ‘anti-epiphany’.

By its very virtue, an epiphany is exhilarating, promising and smacking of revelation.

This experience certainly had the latter, though tinged by the accompanying dull thud of the death knell tolling.

For it seems we have lost a crucial component in the pop culture world: the kick-ass, smart-talking and steely eyed woman.

Eclipse director David Slade. And pretty much my stance as the credits rolled.

Admittedly, she has been in decline for a number of years, as a quick read of Sara Crosby’s 2004 article ‘The Cruelest Season: Female Heroes Snapped into Sacrificial Heroines‘ attests.

Ten years on and we have plumbed new depths of female weakness as the film adaptations of Stephenie Meyer’s vampirical saga Twilight bring increasingly more furrowed brows, teary eyes and general limp-wristedness.

Sure, I enjoyed the books – as far as escapism goes the exploits of Bella Swan and her merry band of in-fighting boy toys affords a pleasing jaunt.

The latest adaptation, Eclipse, was too painful by far, however: putting aside that the make-up was diabolical for all the wrong reasons, the utter absence of fangs and a penchant for be-kohled eyebrows with blonde hair, the female characters were more insipid than a de-boned squid.

A brief, if not tormented, recollection raises the following spectres of spinelessness:

Bella, who is trapped in a love triangle that places her life forever at risk; with such odds, one would imagine that a crash course in survival and defence would be in order – not so.

While in the book Bella is instructed by Edward in fighting technique, in the film she merely swings from left to right, arms dangling with all the strength of a damp rag-doll.

Her endless whining that rarely produces a plan, let alone a modicum of intelligence (choice quote: “It’s a bed.” No! Really?!) presents the viewer with a character who not only lacks the physical means to survive, but also a vacuum of acumen.

Alice, supposedly the more insightful of the vampire clan, passes most of the movie wide-eyed, mouth agape or jumping into the arms of her beau, Jasper.

Rosalie, originally fiery and opinionated, is reduced to a cat-faced scowl, moody stalking off stage right and an endless longing for babies.

Esme, the mother figure, mostly stands doe-eyed by her husband and intervenes only to adopt the soon-to-perish vampirelet, Bree Tanner.

Bella’s mother, Renee, dedicates her life to sitting by a pool in a range of head-fancies, sipping pina coladas and talking about her sport coach husband, Phil.

Victoria, the only woman with an iota of physical force, is the malign, manipulative vixen.

Using her red locks and come-hither mewls to captivate and manipulate Riley, the character is merely another femme fatale of the cookie cutter variety.

One could go on, but the general themes can be condensed into three main types: the maternal (Esme, Rosalie), the passive (Bella, Renee, Alice) and the mean (Victoria, Jane).

None of the above are portrayed to excel either intellectually nor physically, while women are to be either tamed or sacrificed.

They neither contradict staunchly, respond savvily nor argue vociferously.

When Jacob kisses Bella by force, her weakness (broken hand after punching him) is rendered the crux of a joke.

Which leaves only one conclusion: the kick-ass chick is dead and the only consolation is that this might one day take place.

Hobbit Lore

Tonight I must party.

Monday I must move house.

Between the two, even the most devastating dress and pompously red shoes cannot raise an iota of enthusiasm.

But wait – what is this I hear?

Why, it is the opening chords of Lord of the Rings: the Two Towers.

And suddenly, everything seems just about wonderful:

I know. It’s all wrong. By rights we shouldn’t even be here. But we are. It’s like in the great stories, Mr. Frodo. The ones that really mattered. Full of darkness and danger, they were. And sometimes you didn’t want to know the end. Because how could the end be happy? How could the world go back to the way it was when so much bad had happened? But in the end, it’s only a passing thing, this shadow. Even darkness must pass. A new day will come. And when the sun shines it will shine out the clearer. Those were the stories that stayed with you. That meant something, even if you were too small to understand why. But I think, Mr. Frodo, I do understand. I know now. Folk in those stories had lots of chances of turning back, only they didn’t. They kept going. Because they were holding on to something.

Will there ever be an author as God-like as Tolkein?

I doubt it.

But will save that particular droplet of despondence for another day.

Ornaments for Summer Days

Struck down by a particularly virulent effect of a dodgy chicken panini, I have consoled myself through that which is guaranteed to tickle, amuse and stimulate the mind: Oscar Wilde.

This time it is The Picture of Dorian Gray, and while nigh every line comprises a quip that sets one marvelling at his sheer genius, one paragraph stood out as an enduringly succinct précis on every man I have known:

“He likes me,” he answered after a pause; “I know he likes me. Of course I flatter him dreadfully. I find a strange pleasure in saying things to him that I know I shall be sorry for having said. As a rule, he is charming to me, and we sit in the studio and talk of a thousand things. Now and then, however, he is horribly thoughtless, and seems to take a delight in giving me pain. Then I feel, Harry, that I have given away my whole soul to some one who treats it as if it were a flower to put in his coat, a bit of decoration to charm his vanity, an ornament for a summer’s day.” (p. 12)

Time may progress, but men – it seems – rarely do.

On Fanon

Frantz Fanon has always captured my attention: his passion, his naked vehemence and most of all the burning veracity of his arguments renders him one of the most influential and relevant of anti-colonialist thinkers.

And the fact that the above is composed in the present tense is quite deliberate – to read the below, written in 1961, very little has changed:

Let us waste no time in sterile litanies and nauseating mimicry. Leave this Europe where they are never done talking of Man, yet murder men everywhere they find them, at the corner of every one of their own streets, in all the corners of the globe. For centuries they have stifled almost the whole of humanity in the name of so-called spiritual experience.

Written from the midst of the Algerian War, Fanon provided a voice for those oppressed by colonialism.

Most striking is his identification of the autochthonous cronies: we so often forget that for every occupying force there are those on the ground who provide if not the foundations, then the sustenance.

As an anthropologist at heart I hold little love for political theory – it instill a sense of tedium that aches to the back of my eyeballs.

Fanon is the first – and perhaps only and last – thinker who resonates.

He did not shroud his anti-colonialist rage: it is bare, blistering and profound.

Fanon died at the age of 36 of leukemia.

Of the great feats he achieved in those too few years, one can only imagine how much more he could have inspired.

*Wretched of the Earth by Frantz Fanon, 1961.

Supping with Tolstoy and Chekhov

There is an oft-used question – usually to determine one’s degree of culture and taste – that runs along the lines of who one would invite to dinner, drawing from individuals of any period.

As well as being slightly gimmicky, the question also provides an abundance of thought on lengthy journeys, predominantly when the last battery has run out (ergo no music) and the final page consumed.

At this moment, no greater answer can be expressed than that which is comprised in the image below.

Chekhov and Tolstoy.

Arguably two of the greatest writers this world has known, seated together for a tête-a-tête.

What I wouldn’t give to have been in attendance.

Any idiot can face a crisis – it’s day to day living that wears you out.

- Chekhov

All, everything that I understand, I understand only because I love.

- Tolstoy

Poetry Corner: Diary of a Palestinian Wound

Read each verse.

Mull it.

Savor it.

And the sheer poetic beauty shall unfurl and irrepressibly astound.

For Fadwa Tuqan

We do not need to be reminded:

Mount Carmel is in us and on our eyelashes the grass of Galilee.

Do not say: If we could run to her like a river.

Do not say it:

We and our country are one flesh and bone.

***

You sang your poems, I saw the balconies

desert their walls

the city square extending to the midriff of the mountain:

It was not music we heard.

It was not the color of words we saw:

A million heroes were in the room.

***

This land absorbs the skins of martyrs.

This land promises wheat and stars.

Worship it!

We are its salt and its water.

We are its wound, but a wound that fights.

***

Sister, there are tears in my throat

and there is fire in my eyes:

I am free.

No more shall I protest at the Sultan’s Gate.

All who have died, all who shall die at the Gate of Day

have embraced me, have made of me a weapon.

***

Ah my intractable wound!

My country is not a suitcase

I am not a traveler

I am the lover and the land is the beloved.

***
The archaeologist is busy analyzing stones.

In the rubble of legends he searches for his own eyes

to show

that I am a sightless vagrant on the road

with not one letter in civilization’s alphabet.

Meanwhile in my own time I plant my trees.

I sing of my love.

***

It is time for me to exchange the word for the deed

Time to prove my love for the land and for the nightingale:

For in this age the weapon devours the guitar

And in the mirror I have been fading more and more

Since at my back a tree began to grow.

Mahmoud Darwish (1941-2008)

This is now tacked to both my office and home wall, to remind of the sheer beauty that can be rendered by the mere pen and mind.

Jordan’s ‘Last Best Chance’


The best the Middle East can hope for. Apparently.

No, really – I kid not.

It’s been a long time coming, but the personal memoir of Abdullah – scheduled for a May 2010 release – is so pompously preposterous in title that it is questionable whether the promised “secret, high-level negotiations that could soon transform our map of the Middle East” will live up to the hype.

Our Last Best Chance: The Pursuit of Peace in a Time of Peril will be published in May 2010 as an Allen Lane hardback, simultaneously with the Viking edition in the US, and the Arabic publication by Dar El Shorouk.

The Good, Cohesive Old Days

I tell a lie – the second book is a little gem and while it scores less on the academic front (in terms of analytical and theoretical framework) I am secretly deeply charmed by it.

Comprising 20 first-person narratives by Muslim women in a northern British town, their insights are gentle, engaging and by turns compelling.

And as I near my conclusion, one quote jumped out more than others.

Reflecting on meeting her Algerian husband at the age of 16 (circa 1980s), Rabia notes the manner in which religion in the context of relationships has emerged to the fore:

I never asked him anything about Islam. […] Nowadays, I think a young girl meeting a Muslim boy, it would be the first point of conversation [...] I was just interested in him as a person but not where he’d come from or his culture or his religious background.

The final sentence is possibly the most innocent and beautiful I’ve read in a while.

Sure, it’s no Kundera, but its simplicity and veracity are so touching.

Maybe that’s how we used to be before 9/11.

Just a society falling in love for who the other person was, not where they were from or what denomination or faith.

I want to go back to that.

Because I am there already, even if certain elements in society still have to catch up to it.

Bookwormery

Despite the maelstrom of deadlines billowing about my desk, I still have time to flit between books like a literary harlot.

Right now I have five on the go, with some garnering more attention than others.

I am ashamed to admit that the scale of attention leans much heavier towards the fantastical than the academic, with the most dour entries languishing at the bottom, when they should really be on top.

Tsk, tsk.

The guilty parties first then:

Breaking Dawn by Stephenie Meyer. Vampires. Emotional turmoil. Strapping young men with a propensity for shirt removal. Need I add more? This is guilty literary pleasure at its finest and is almost viral: until I finish this goliath bloodfest, there is no contender for the top spot of my bookish time.

Unspeakable Love: Gay and Lesbian Life in the Middle East by Brian Whitaker. Started off as a work-read, now an addictive, informative and utterly engrossing read. I read forty pages in 45 minutes at the weekend (laundry time). Enough said. Incredible.

Dracula by Bram Stoker. As above, but the original, the finest, and the perfect accompaniment to a night alone in a room facing pine-smothered hills accompanied by a howlingly cruel gale that whips the windows with passionate ferocity. If Breaking Dawn is a box of chocolates, then Dracula is eating Nutella with a spoon. A big spoon. From the jar.

The Return by Håkan Nesser. Since catching the original Wallander series I have had an insatiable craving for all things detective and Scandinavian. Admittedly, I also bought this book after a chance discovery. Nevertheless, I am determined to finish it by Christmas and find out who really did kill the recently released convict and athletic hero.

The remaining two are under review, so it is perhaps not most prudent to debate their virtues and vices here.

Nevertheless, I am juggling the books with horrendous commitment and shamelessly apportion all the blame to Meyer.

For her saga is simply irresistable.

Israel: An Invented Nation?

BookThe soon-to-be release of the English language edition of The Invention of the Jewish People by Professor Shlomo Sands is tremendously exciting, questioning as it does the very connection between the Jewish community and Israel:

Shlomo Sand argues that most Jews actually descend from converts, whose native lands were scattered far across the Middle East and Eastern Europe. The formation of a Jewish people and then a Jewish nation out of these disparate groups could only take place under the sway of a new historiography, developing in response to the rise of nationalism throughout Europe. Beneath the biblical backfill of the nineteenth-century historians, and the twentieth-century intellectuals who replaced rabbis as the architects of Jewish identity, The Invention of the Jewish People uncovers a new narrative of Israel’s formation, and proposes a bold analysis of nationalism that accounts for the old myths.

Nationalism, innovative theoretical perspectives… notch it up on my winter reading list.