Tags
After a long weekend home in which work was minimal and delicious food plentiful, I am (ruefully) back.
Despite the mood of moroseness, the following story has succeeded in permeating the post-vacation gloom to elicit a vague ‘oh’:
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad revealed to have Jewish past
A photograph of the Iranian president holding up his identity card during elections in March 2008 clearly shows his family has Jewish roots.
A close-up of the document reveals he was previously known as Sabourjian – a Jewish name meaning cloth weaver.
The short note scrawled on the card suggests his family changed its name to Ahmadinejad when they converted to embrace Islam after his birth. [Continue...]
Interestingly, it is his multi-faith background that fuels his vitriol, as Ali Nourizadeh, of the Centre for Arab and Iranian Studies, indicates:
This aspect of Mr Ahmadinejad’s background explains a lot about him. Every family that converts into a different religion takes a new identity by condemning their old faith. By making anti-Israeli statements he is trying to shed any suspicions about his Jewish connections. He feels vulnerable in a radical Shia society.
Pity – imagine the possibilities if individuals exalted their multi-faith roots for the better, rather than concealing and condemning.
Although the subject of much dispute, I believe it is possible to be Jewish and anti-Zionist.
Indubitably, the faith holds tremendous links to the founding ideologies of Israel, but there should be a delineation between the heritage, culture and identity of individuals and their political orientation.
Of course, these are murky waters: the crux resides in Ahmadinejad’s response, for which the presidential press office is doubtless going into overdrive.
hmm, the reporter is doing that classic thing of relating anti-zionism to anti-semitism. And anyway, his conversion may mean that he no longer practices judaism, but we are told jewishness is a race and culture, so why would his conversion cease to make him a jew? v. confusing
I agree – it’s truly irksome when the two are regarded as interchangeable. A clear delineation must always be made.
I think in most faiths changing one’s religion removes the individual from the faith; ethnically, it is much more complex. It is almost subjective, depending on how far the person wishes to reinvent their identity, as well as how far they believe in it.