Tags

, , ,

After a long weekend home in which work was minimal and delicious food plentiful, I am (ruefully) back.

Despite the mood of moroseness, the following story has succeeded in permeating the post-vacation gloom to elicit a vague ‘oh’:

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad revealed to have Jewish past
A photograph of the Iranian president holding up his identity card during elections in March 2008 clearly shows his family has Jewish roots.
A close-up of the document reveals he was previously known as Sabourjian – a Jewish name meaning cloth weaver.
The short note scrawled on the card suggests his family changed its name to Ahmadinejad when they converted to embrace Islam after his birth.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad revealed to have Jewish past

A photograph of the Iranian president holding up his identity card during elections in March 2008 clearly shows his family has Jewish roots.

A close-up of the document reveals he was previously known as Sabourjian – a Jewish name meaning cloth weaver.

The short note scrawled on the card suggests his family changed its name to Ahmadinejad when they converted to embrace Islam after his birth. [Continue...]

Interestingly, it is his multi-faith background that fuels his vitriol, as Ali Nourizadeh, of the Centre for Arab and Iranian Studies, indicates:

This aspect of Mr Ahmadinejad’s background explains a lot about him. Every family that converts into a different religion takes a new identity by condemning their old faith. By making anti-Israeli statements he is trying to shed any suspicions about his Jewish connections. He feels vulnerable in a radical Shia society.

Pity – imagine the possibilities if individuals exalted their multi-faith roots for the better, rather than concealing and condemning.

Although the subject of much dispute, I believe it is possible to be Jewish and anti-Zionist.

Indubitably, the faith holds tremendous links to the founding ideologies of Israel, but there should be a delineation between the heritage, culture and identity of individuals and their political orientation.

Of course, these are murky waters: the crux resides in Ahmadinejad’s response, for which the presidential press office is doubtless going into overdrive.

Advertisement